Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BackupBluRay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BackupBluRay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any coverage. A commenter in the first AfD said that an expert could likely show notability. This is a piece of software to rip copy protected films so the "experts" would be movie pirates. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 10:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Another editor in the previous AfD said that this software caused a media stir. That claim belongs to BackupHDDVD. SL93 (talk) 10:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 03:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking RS references. Search reveals no significant coverage in reliable sources, though there are a few incidental mentions from 2007.Dialectric (talk) 14:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.